• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Authors
  • Contact Us

The Punjab Pulse

Centre for Socio-Cultural Studies

  • Areas of Study
    • Social & Cultural Studies
    • Religious Studies
    • Governance & Politics
    • National Perspectives
    • International Perspectives
    • Communism
  • Activities
    • Conferences & Seminars
    • Discussions
  • News
  • Resources
    • Books & Publications
    • Book Reviews
  • Icons of Punjab
  • Videos
  • Academics
  • Agriculture
You are here: Home / Areas of Study / Governance & Politics / China has no claim on Tibet &East Turkestan, what to talk of Ladakh

China has no claim on Tibet &East Turkestan, what to talk of Ladakh

July 1, 2020 By Jaibans Singh

Share

Jaibans Singh

Actual China shown in Red

The history of South Asia and China was dominated by the British broadly from the 17th century  to mid-20th century. Today, almost seven decades after the exit of the British, India and China remain unable to reconcile to their new destinies and move on. Border demarcation done at the time of the British rule has become an issue and is dominating the political spectrum. Over almost seven decades and even after fighting a full-fledged war, it has not seen settlement. To find a way forward  it is necessary to go briefly into the history that impacts the situation.

Ladakh was conquered by General Zorawar Singh and amalgamated into the Sikh Empire in 1834. After the first Anglo-Sikh War, 1845-46, the British took Kashmir Valley, Ladakh and Gilgit-Baltistan as war indemnity from the Sikhs and, in accordance with the Treaty of Amritsar, sold the territories to Gulab Singh, the Dogra Rajah (King) of Jammu for a sum of Rupees 7.5 million.  Thus was created the state of Jammu and Kashmir with the title of Maharaja bestowed upon Gulab Singh by the British. The royal Namgyal family of Ladakh was given Stok as Jagir, which it retains nominally to date.

Jammu and Kashmir remained a princely state all through the British rule. The Dogras administered Ladakh as a Wazarat (principality) with an independent Governor on three Tehsils (Districts) of Leh, Skardu and Kargil.  Ladakh was given two seats in a Legislative Assembly called Praja Sabha that was established in 1934 by Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu and Kashmir in an attempt to usher democratic tenets into the monarchy.

Once India became independent , Maharaja Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession on 26, October, 1947, effective 27, October, 1947, making Jammu and Kashmir an integral part of India. Hence, there remains no doubt about Ladakh being a part of India.

China too has a diverse and interesting trajectory of evolution. In the 19th century (after 1932) the British had already started getting seriously involved Chinese politics. As a consequence of the Opium Wars a fair degree of control over Chinese affairs came in the hands of the British. In 1912, the Qing dynasty declined in the face of challenges from abroad and internal revolts. The British hold strengthened.

Around that time, the demarcation line between Tibet and the North-East region of India was created and named the “McMohan Line.” It was ratified in 1914 by the Simla Convention between British and Tibetan representatives.

With the decline of the monarchy, China embarked on to a tryst of becoming a Republic. The journey of transition was long and arduous, marked by a long struggle of power mainly between  the Kuomintang (KMT) also referred to the Chinese Nationalist Party and the  Communist Party of China that came into existence in 1921. After thousands being killed in debilitating civil wars ultimately, on 1 October, 1949, mainly due to Soviet support, the communists gained control of mainland China in what is generally referred to as the Chinese Communist Revolution. Mao Zedong, became the founding father of the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). Communist China moved swiftly to gain control over many neighbouring areas of which East Turkmenistan, Tibet and South Mongolia are the most prominent.

Significantly, India has borders only with the occupied territories of East Turkestan and Tibet and not with mainland China. Also, the McMohan Line was not contested all through the period of political turmoil in China and Tibet, nor was it contested at the time when the British left India.

Two factors emerge from the foregoing. First, Ladakh was a part of India about 87 years before the PRC came into existence and 115 years before it gained power in China. Second, the Government of China at the time when the British were leaving the sub-continent did not object to the McMohan line. PRC was quite powerful even then, it could have raised an issue but it did not.

The first prime minister of India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, having accepted the Suzerainty of China over Tibet refused to be party to negotiations based on a perceived boundary dispute between the two countries. He insisted that the boundary stood resolved along the McMohan Line. In this he had the complete support of the Indian Parliament.

China, rejected and continues to reject the Simla Accord contending that Tibet was not a sovereign state and therefore did not have the power to conclude treaties. Chinese maps show some 65,000 sq km of territory south of the line as part of the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) and calls it South Tibet.

China, however, had tacitly accepted the Line of Actual Control (LAC) as it exists between East Turkestan and India . In a letter to Nehru dated 24, October, 1959, Zhou Enlai proposed that India and China withdraw their forces 20 kilometers from the LAC. Even after the Indo-China War of 1962, the Chinese unilaterally withdrew to the earlier demarcation of the LAC, except for Aksai Chin.

History is replete with instances of great Empires breaking  due to overextension through forcible subjugation. The latest example is the breakup of the USSR. Communist China has forcibly occupied Tibet, East Turkestan, South Mongolia and other territories. There are voices being raised against this forcible occupation and against incidents of gross human rights violation of the people of these areas by the repressive Chinese regime are being reported.

Being unable to control what it has, one wonders as to why China is nibbling into Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh where it has no jurisdiction or justification of claim whatsoever.  For the sake of a few kilometers of territory that does not even belong to it, the country is jeopardising goodwill and Billions worth of trade with India. It is unwilling to understand that the huge potential of Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh can be best leveraged by both countries through friendly relations. In fact, East Turkestan and Tibet will contribute more to the prosperity of mainland China if they are freed from the existing shackles and blatant suppression.  Significantly, India and China are harbingers of the prosperous future of the region being super powers. They should understand their responsibility.

India needs to rework its posture on its borders on the basis of historical facts. If at all, borders can be discussed only with Tibet and East Turkestan as and when they gain independence. There is nothing to be discussed with the PRC and  the McMohan Line remains the irrefutable border. An attempt by China to change the same should be termed as aggression against the sovereignty of India and dealt with accordingly. Diplomatic and military attempts need to be made to get back Indian territories under forcible occupation of China.

(Jaibans Singh is a geo-strategic analyst, writer and commentator)


Share
test

Filed Under: Governance & Politics, Stories & Articles Tagged With: Communist Party of China, Gen. Zorawar Singh, Instrument of Accession, Mao Zedong, McMohan Line

Primary Sidebar

News

ਪੰਜਾਬ ਚ ਖੇਡਾਂ

February 4, 2023 By News Bureau

ਸਿੱਖ ਫੌਜੀਆਂ ਲਈ ਹੈਲਮੇਟ ਲਾਜ਼ਮੀ ਕਰਨ ਦੇ ਫ਼ੈਸਲੇ ਦਾ ਵਿਰੋਧ

February 4, 2023 By News Bureau

ਪ੍ਰਨੀਤ ਕੌਰ ਕਾਂਗਰਸ ’ਚੋਂ ਮੁਅੱਤਲ

February 4, 2023 By News Bureau

आप सरकार के सत्ता में आने से पंजाब में आया बड़ा बदलाव

February 4, 2023 By News Bureau

मोटा अनाज खाएं; जल-जमीन और जीवन बचाएं

February 4, 2023 By News Bureau

Areas of Study

  • Governance & Politics
  • International Perspectives
  • National Perspectives
  • Social & Cultural Studies
  • Religious Studies

Featured Article

The actual message and etymology of Sri Guru Granth Sahib needs to be preserved

January 31, 2023 By Guest Author

Dr. Rajinder Pal Singh Sri Guru Granth Sahib, the eternal living Guru continues to inspire mankind and provide guidance for God realisation and truthful living. It contains the teachings of the Sikh Gurus as well as of Hindu and Muslim saints. Eternal wisdom flows from its teachings which are recited and sung with intense devotion […]

Academics

‘सिंघसूरमा लेखमाला’ धर्मरक्षक वीरव्रति खालसा पंथ – भाग-10 – भाग-11

सिंघसूरमा लेखमाला धर्मरक्षक वीरव्रति खालसा पंथ – भाग-10 विजयी सैन्य शक्ति के प्रतीक ‘पांच प्यारे’ और पांच ‘ककार’ नरेंद्र सहगल श्रीगुरु गोविंदसिंह द्वारा स्थापित ‘खालसा पंथ’ किसी एक प्रांत, जाति या भाषा का दल अथवा पंथ नहीं था। यह तो संपूर्ण भारत एवं भारतीयता के सुरक्षा कवच के रूप में तैयार की गई खालसा फौज […]

‘सिंघसूरमा लेखमाला’ धर्मरक्षक वीरव्रति खालसा पंथ – भाग-8 – भाग-9

सिंघसूरमा लेखमाला धर्मरक्षक वीरव्रति खालसा पंथ – भाग-8 अमृत शक्ति-पुत्रों का वीरव्रति सैन्य संगठन नरेंद्र सहगल संपूर्ण भारत को ‘दारुल इस्लाम’ इस्लामिक मुल्क बनाने के उद्देश्य से मुगल शासकों द्वारा किए गए और किए जा रहे घोर अत्याचारों को देखकर दशम् गुरु श्रीगुरु गोविंदसिंह ने सोए हुए हिंदू समाज में क्षात्रधर्म का जाग्रण करके एक […]

‘सिंघसूरमा लेखमाला’ धर्मरक्षक वीरव्रति खालसा पंथ – भाग-6 – भाग-7

सिंघसूरमा लेखमाला धर्मरक्षक वीरव्रति खालसा पंथ – भाग-6 श्रीगुरु गोबिन्दसिंह का जीवनोद्देश्य धर्म की स्थापना, अधर्म का नाश नरेंद्र सहगल ‘हिन्द दी चादर’ अर्थात भारतवर्ष का सुरक्षा कवच सिख साम्प्रदाय के नवम् गुरु श्रीगुरु तेगबहादुर ने हिन्दुत्व अर्थात भारतीय जीवन पद्यति, सांस्कृतिक धरोहर एवं स्वधर्म की रक्षा के लिए अपना बलिदान देकर मुगलिया दहशतगर्दी को […]

Twitter Feed

The Punjab Pulse Follow

The Punjab Pulse is an independent, non-partisan think tank engaged in research and in-depth study of all aspects the impact the state of Punjab and Punjabis

ThePunjabPulse
Retweet on Twitter The Punjab Pulse Retweeted
gopalsa22721269 गोपाल सनातनी @gopalsa22721269 ·
4 Feb

निकले तो भारत जोड़ने थे लेकिन यात्रा में बुलाया उनको जो कभी भारत को तोड़ने की बात कर चुके हैं!!

Reply on Twitter 1621779051957587968 Retweet on Twitter 1621779051957587968 12 Like on Twitter 1621779051957587968 19 Twitter 1621779051957587968
Retweet on Twitter The Punjab Pulse Retweeted
gopalsa22721269 गोपाल सनातनी @gopalsa22721269 ·
4 Feb

यही सोच कोंग्रेस को पनपने नही दे रही है जिसने कोंग्रेस का भला किया उसके साथ ऐसा ही व्यवहार करते हैं ??

Reply on Twitter 1621756288521875456 Retweet on Twitter 1621756288521875456 14 Like on Twitter 1621756288521875456 17 Twitter 1621756288521875456
Retweet on Twitter The Punjab Pulse Retweeted
ourindiafirst19 India First @ourindiafirst19 ·
4 Feb

स्वदेशी से बढ़ रही आत्मनिर्भर भारत की धाक 💪

Reply on Twitter 1621762337660350464 Retweet on Twitter 1621762337660350464 14 Like on Twitter 1621762337660350464 45 Twitter 1621762337660350464
Load More

EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Signup to receive regular updates and to hear what's going on with us.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

TAGS

Academics Activities Agriculture Areas of Study Books & Publications Communism Conferences & Seminars Discussions Governance & Politics Icons of Punjab International Perspectives National Perspectives News Religious Studies Resources Social & Cultural Studies Stories & Articles Uncategorized Videos

Footer

About Us

The Punjab Pulse is an independent, non-partisan think tank engaged in research and in-depth study of all aspects the impact the state of Punjab and Punjabis at large. It strives to provide a platform for a wide ranging dialogue that promotes the interest of the state and its peoples.

Read more

Follow Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2023 · The Punjab Pulse

Developed by Web Apps Interactive